A proposed ballot measure to give Democrats more seats for the 2028 and 2030 elections signals that the nation’s ...
This week- 11th Congressional District Remap Case Awaits Decisions from N.Y. Appellate Division & U.S. Supreme Court; Pending Census Litigation, Election Administration and Legislation News; Attorney ...
The Democratic legislature has passed a constitutional amendment allowing lawmakers to redraw congressional districts before the midterms. If voters say yes to a referendum on April 21, the Democrats ...
The precedent and, if there were to be an appeals court affirmation, would have a greater impact on Louisiana than Florida, ...
Why would the voters undo their decision to take power from the politicians? California voters are woke on many levels. The “Orange Man Bad” routine triggers them. Trump hatred is easy politics for ...
PIERCE, ANGELA ROZIER WPBF 25 NEWS BREAKING NEWS FROM WASHINGTON, DC NOW ETHICS COMMITTEES, INVESTIGATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE SAYS IT HAS FOUND, QUOTE, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT SOUTH FLORIDA CONGRESSWOMAN ...
As Hakeem Jeffries sits in the minority of a GOP-controlled Washington, he is still haunted by a Republican gerrymandering gambit that he believes cost him the speaker’s gavel — and cost his party ...
The ruling by the justices in a 2019 case called Rucho v. Common Cause stripped federal courts of their power to police a practice known as partisan gerrymandering. It involves states redrawing the ...
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled Friday the state can put a redistricting plan on the ballot this spring that could add four more Democratic seats in Congress. The redistricting referendum will take ...
New York Rep. Nicole Malliotakis asked the Supreme Court on Friday to stop a state court order to redraw her district ahead of the midterms.
In a procedural win for Democrats, the court ruled Virginia may go ahead with the statewide April 21 vote, with early voting starting March 6, on the map passed by the state legislature that could ...
The Virginia Supreme Court has acted more quickly in the past. Why is it intentionally putting off a ruling here until after Virginians vote?